10.22.2007

History Repeats Itself: Why Slavery Still Exists in Today's World

In 1807 the transatlantic slave trade was abolished, terminating the forcible shipment of millions of Africans to the United States and Caribbean to work on sugar and cotton plantations. Now, two hundred years later, many regard slavery as an institution of the past, a product of a bygone era of unspeakable injustice and racism. True, long gone are the days of legal enslavement and masters of southern mansions; however slavery has managed to escape the confines of history and still shockingly exists today in the form of human trafficking. Essentially, trafficking occurs when men, women or children are illegally transported to other countries often upon the promise of a job or better life, and coerced into labor or sexual exploitation. From Uzbeks sold as compulsory laborers in Russia to Nepalese women and girls forced into a life of prostitution in India, modern-day slavery is present internationally (see map at left) and has been reported in over 100 countries. While human trafficking has undoubtedly developed into a complex, global issue with major political and social implications, it is predominantly instigated by economic problems in developing countries that create a steady supply of potential victims.

In terms of supply, poverty is often referred to as the major contributing or push factor that leads victims to accept the fraudulent offers from traffickers or sell family members into slavery for meager amounts of money. While both are unthinkable options, the underprivileged rarely have much choice in the matter. In rapidly developing nations such as India “seventy-seven percent of Indians—about 836 million people—live on less than fifty cents per day,” which is well under the extreme poverty limit of one dollar per day set by the World Bank. Furthermore, according to the International Labor Organization (ILO), this situation is caused by low wages rather than unemployment. The ILO maintains that the most common misconception about poverty is that the poor do not work and cites regional rates of unemployment as evidence. South Asia, for example, is one of the poorest areas in world, yet its unemployment rate is only 4.8 percent while in comparison,the United States' is 5.1 percent. Clearly, employment in developing countries is not the problem—compensation is. The prospect of a well-paying job in another country is enough to lead the naïve straight into the trafficking trap.

Moreover, in these poor countries, the poverty situation is often aggravated by wars, natural disasters or civil unrest which inflates the supply of economically vulnerable people. The U.S. Department of State’s Trafficking in Persons Report describes dramatic increases in rape, sexual abuse, kidnapping and trafficking in the countries devastated by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. In the aftermath of the disaster, “thousands of orphaned children were vulnerable to exploitation by criminal elements seeking profit from their misery.” A similar effect is presently occurring in war-torn Darfur where thousands of women and children, in hopes of escaping the violent conflict, have found themselves victims of horrendous trafficking by virtually all armed groups involved in the Sudanese civil war. The Lord’s Resistance Army, one of the rebel organizations, is “estimated to have abducted over 16,000 children,” and forced them to work as servants, cooks and even soldiers (see photo at right) in the neighboring countries of Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Evidently, these kinds of political and environmental calamities that plague developing nations have increased the number of impoverished people and facilitated human trafficking.

However, the aforementioned supply factors that cause poverty are not the only economic instigators in the trafficking issue. As any elementary course in economics would teach, a market for a good is created from supply and demand for the product, and is perpetuated if the product is profitable. The market for human slaves is no exception to the rule. The criminals who run the trafficking rings would not be involved in the business if there was no demand for the products they offer and no profit potential, but clearly this is not the case. Demand for cheap labor and prostitution remain high in developed nations such as the U.S. and the E.U., where labor costs are a company’s greatest expense and paying for sex is outlawed. To meet these needs, 600,000 to 800,000 people are annually trafficked across national borders creating a lucrative $32 billion dollar black-market industry. Still, trafficking could not exist without the supply push factors from developing nations. If the economic situations in these countries were desirable, fewer people would be baited by the false promise of a better life or job elsewhere and the industry would dwindle without a pool of victims. In order to reach the point where trafficking is no longer a threat, world leaders and organizations must work with struggling nations to create better domestic job markets, ensure higher wages and educate citizens about the dangers of trafficking. These endeavors will not only work to eliminate the supply, but will help to finally create the slave-free world that was envisioned in the early 1800s.

1 comment:

JLK said...

The topic of slavery is not much discussed in a contemporary context these days. I think bringing light to this subject is relevant and has a very serious implication for the victims of slavery. The post begins well with a historical context reminding people what Americans have been capable of without throwing the reader right into the middle of the issue. Your transition to a contemporary context is well worded and probably reflects the reader's own reactions to the information. The post is well organized and flows well from point to point. I also think the use of economic theory to explain the continuation and possible deterrents of modern slavery is an interesting thought and deserves contemplation. I wish you had gone into a little more detail concerning how people trick potential slaves into trafficking perhaps including a few more examples or a personal anecdote (not necessarily from your own experience). Your use of figures and pictures is notable and add authority to the post. There a few places where the word choice is not best, but those are relatively minor and do not detract from the post as a whole. Use of integrated quotes is good, and the links are informative and add context and depth to the blog. All in all, a strong topic with well written support.