11.06.2007

Black Gold: Oil's Influence on the World Economy

Last Thursday, consumers worldwide felt their pocketbooks pinch as the price of crude oil surged to ninety-six dollars per barrel. This number falls just shy of the inflation-adjusted 1979 record of $100.28 per barrel, but economists predict that oil prices will rise well above this level by the end of the year. While industry leaders blame the latest price spike on tensions between Turkey and Iraq, long term price escalation can be attributed to the increase in global demand for a diminishing supply of oil. In light of the recent media attention devoted to oil-related events in the economy, I decided to search the blogosphere for scholarly and expert analysis of the current crisis. The first blog I found, Energy Filter, is written by a Financial Times editor, Ed Crooks. In his post “Total Chief Skeptical about Future Oil Supplies,” Crooks writes about the 2007 Oil and Money Conference and describes the debate over the accuracy of market predictions. The second blog I discovered, The Streetwise Professor, explores current events in the world economy and is written by a finance professor at the University of Houston. His post, “Talk about Timing”, examines the Chinese government’s reaction to rising oil prices. After reading both posts, I offered my own analysis of the topic and a reproduction of my comments can be found below:

“Total Chief Skeptical about Future Oil Supplies”:

As a finance student and oil consumer, I find your economic analysis of the current oil situation insightful and provocative. After reading this post and learning about the debate regarding oil output and prices, I am not surprised that the experts participating in the Oil and Money conference are hesitant to predict the future cost of crude oil. As you imply when you write “predicting oil prices is a mug’s game,” the forecasts tend to be incorrect due to the volatility of the market. Despite my lack of confidence in price estimations, I still find that certain market predictions are critical in determining the oil industry’s future, which leads me to disagree with your point about production factors. You write that above-ground factors such as “the lack of capacity in the industry to develop resources sufficiently quickly” are more important than the below-ground factors such as the geology of the oil reserves. While a short term analysis of the current oil crisis would merit such a conclusion, the below ground factors you describe as unimportant will ultimately have a greater long term impact on consumers and the economy. Currently, scientists estimate the depletion of the world’s oil supply using the Hubbert Peak for World Oil (which is the basis of the Peak Oil theory you mention in your previous post), and studies based on this theory indicate that complete depletion will occur shortly after 2050. Regardless of whether the supply will completely diminish as fast as predicted, how will “above ground factors” be important when there is little oil left to process?

“Talk About Timing”:

After extensively researching the effect of rising oil prices on the economy, I appreciate your intelligent and clear analysis of the current Chinese oil crisis. Although almost every national economy is suffering from crude oil costs of nearly one hundred dollars per barrel, developing countries seem to have the hardest time adjusting to the price increases. From your post, it is obvious that China is no exception to the rule—only after severe shortages and civil unrest has the government finally agreed to establish price controls. While this is a step in the right direction, the effect of these policies is still unknown and you point out that “depending on how China adjusts these policy instruments, the raising of the price ceilings could ease some pressure on the demand for oil.” However, even if the measures prove to be immediately successful, I am concerned that subsidies and price controls will not effectively reduce the Chinese economy’s long term dependence on crude oil. Today, scientists predict that the world’s oil supply will be depleted by 2050 and this has major implications for developing nations that rely heavily on oil to spur their rapid economic growth. In the future, do you expect emergent economies, such as China, to suffer major setbacks in the absence of oil, or can investment in alternative fuel sources feasibly generate similar financial growth?

1 comment:

CAO said...

Your post flows rather smoothly and your writing is nicely tightened and organized. Your title, however does not strike me as eye catching or appealing, because it is a topic that has been discussed immensely over and over for the last decade or so. On a different note, the use of charts and graphics really demonstrate the point of your post as well as your argument opposing the posts you commented on.

Even though you do not consider yourself to be a person of professional opinion on this subject matter, you treat the situation in your comments with great findings and expertise on the subject matter, which allows the reader to side with you in agreement. It is great that you brought in other professional recourses to prove your argument in your first comment as it really allows the author of the post to reconsider his own thoughts on the subject. Also nice use of inserting quotes of his post within your comment. It shows that you read his post critically and analyzed it thoroughly.

Even with this so called “black gold” has been discussed so often for the past decade, it is starting to come across as “old news.” However, the approach you use and the angle at which your write sparks interest to the reader. Well done.